| Subject: |
|
Re: Test Train 2 |
| Name: |
|
District Dave |
| Date Posted: |
|
Feb 11, 05 - 9:54 PM |
| Message: |
|
Thanks for the post Colin but, as I said to Ian above, it was really just good fortune!
Yes, I agree that perhaps the dot matrix displays could have been larger, but I think it should be remembered that the refurbishment is being done to a budget and that there have been some compromises made from what might have been regarded as 'ideal' had the trains a longer life expectancy than is currently planned.
I have some further information on this, but before 'going public' I want to get the OK to go into further detail - I hope I'll be able to expand very soon.
The PEA low level handles is an obvious concern - and I think everyone I've spoken to accepts that although in principle correct, in practice will result in accidental activations. It's a fact of life, I don't think it will be changed at this stage of the programme, and I think the resulting delays will have to become an accepted occurence. A heads you win, tails you loose scenario! |
|
Replies:
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
Forum
bravenet.com
